Friedman v. D'Amico ( 1910 )

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought for painting and paper hanging on premises the property of the defendant. Defendant claims that she never ordered the work done. She showed that she had a real estate agent, who always attended to this business for her. Plaintiffs admit that the husband gave the order, that they thought that he was the owner, and that they sent him the bill.

Upon this testimony, the judgment is,reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. All concur.