Kirschner v. Hirschberg ( 1904 )

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.