Gottlieb v. Peck & Mack Co. , 119 N.Y.S. 616 ( 1909 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    It seems to us that the complaint states a good cause of action. The proof of plaintiff’s cáse depends upon the question whether the record of the earlier trial will show that the jury made an allowance of $217- upon the offer of the defendant to return goods of that value. Where the complaint states a cause of action, the Mu*617nicipal Court has no power to grant judgment on the pleadings and to deprive the plaintiff of his right to a trial.

    Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 119 N.Y.S. 616

Filed Date: 11/30/1909

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024