Hutkoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad ( 1900 )

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the witness Sammeck warrants a conclusion that the-glass was in good condition when it was delivered upon the car. .

As the defendant’s counsel upon the argument conceded that if this conclusion was warranted the judgment must be affirmed, it is-affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.