Oberstein v. Diack ( 1900 )

Per Curiam.

From the judgment, it seems that the justice found $200 a fair charge for the services claimed to have been rendered for defendant.

The evidence does not warrant the finding, as there is no evidence of the value of the wife’s interest in the policy.

From the evidence, it is not clear that the services were rendered for the defendant.

Present: Truax, P. J., Soott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.