Sondheim v. Schmidt ( 1900 )

Per Curiam.

The ruling which sustained the objection to the question: “Did you in July, 1898, have any conversation with Mr. Sondheim as to cancelling the agreement with the defendants? ” was wrong and may have prejudiced the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.