United Electric Light & Power Co. v. Grand Central Real Estate & Investment Co. , 67 N.Y.S. 1149 ( 1900 )

Per Curiam.

In this case, although the contract was made in the names of Tiernan & S'omers, it was so made at the request of and for the benefit of the defendant, in order to enable it to get the increased discount. Credit was not given to Tiernan & Somers, but was given to the defendant. The earlier bills appear to have been paid by the defendant. This is not a case of one giving credit to a disclosed principal.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.