Hall v. Canary , 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970 ( 1892 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The only exceptions which appear in the record of this appeal and are urged for reversal of the judgment are those taken to the trial justice’s exclusion of certain questions addressed to the witnesses by defend*951ant’s counsel under objection by plaintiff’s counsel. These questions were so palpably incompetent that it seems a mere waste of time to discuss the exceptions taken to their exclusion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 17 N.Y.S. 950, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970

Filed Date: 2/1/1892

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023