Ward v. Edesheimer , 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138 ( 1892 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The questions involved in this action were purely questions of law. There was no substantial conflict in the evidence. We think that the court below has very clearly and succintly stated the law applicable to the facts in this case, and that the judgment should be affirmed on his opinion.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138

Filed Date: 1/4/1892

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023