Wilkes v. Rogers , 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66 ( 1799 )

And they held, therefore, that, where the court below had set aside a master’s report upon matters to which exceptions were hot taken, and required further proof, that the order was ' erroneous, and could not be made even in a case where infants were concerned, if they have a guardian to protect their rights, and the order was reversed accordingly.