Adams v. Hull ( 1799 )


Menu:
  • The Supreme Court held the parol evidence inadmissible, but -

    The Court of Errors reversed the decision, holding it competent for the defendant to prove by parol the considera*309tion of the second note, and thus lay a foundation for the set off pro tanto, against the plaintiff’s demand.

    Reversed 11 to 5.

Document Info

Filed Date: 7/1/1799

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024