Furniss v. Hone , 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 413 ( 1799 )

The Chancellor held it a mere conditional delivery and decreed that Duane, as a general assignee to secure antecedent debts, could not hold the goods against the vendor. On appeal from this decree,

The Court of Errors reversed the decree; holding that, even if the delivery were conditional and not absolute, that a delay of seven days in sending for the notes, would be considered as a waiver oí the condition.

Decree reversed, 18 to 4.

93= See Haggerty v. Palmer, 6 J. C. R. 437.