Utica Insurance v. Scott , 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 394 ( 1799 )

The Supreme Court held, that the replication was bad, for not traversing or denying these facts.

The Court of Errors held, that it was not necessary to traverse or deny those facts, as the facts replied in the inducement to the traverse, were sufficient to sustain the plaintiff’s action—and they reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court.

For reversal, 19 ,• aff. 7.