First Choice Sourcing Solutions, LLC v. Future Tire Company, Ltd. ( 2021 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FIRST CHOICE SOURCING SOLUTIONS, LLC, 20-CV-1299 (ARR) (AYS) Plaintiff, Opinion & Order — against — Not for electronic or print FUTURE TIRE COMPANY, LTD., publication Defendant. ROSS, United States District Judge: This Court has received the Report and Recommendations, dated December 16, 2020, from the Honorable Anne Y. Shields, United States Magistrate Judge, regarding plaintiff’s motion for default judgment and defendant’s motion to vacate the entry of default. No objections have been filed. The Court reviews “de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see also Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-874 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011), aff’d, 472 F. App’x 73 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order). Where no timely objections have been filed, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-0371 (LDH) (LB), 2017 WL 4838764, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Estate of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd., 812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I therefore adopt the Report and Recommendations in its entirety as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Accordingly, defendant’s motion to vacate the entry of default is granted, and plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is denied as moot. SO ORDERED. _______/s/________________ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge Dated: January 3, 2021 Brooklyn, New York