Cato v. Images Cosmetic Surgery ( 2020 )

ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: is UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED; _6/3/20 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee ee eee ee ee ee eee eee eee ee eee eee x DR. STEPHANIE CATO, Plaintiff, 1:18-cy-8198 -against- : ORDER IMAGES COSMETIC SURGERY et a; : Defendants. : eee eee ee eee ee ee ee eee ee eee eee eee eee x ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: On December 3, 2019 the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by January 13, 2019 as to why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute the case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Such showing was not made. Accordingly, this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See LeSane v. Hall's Sec. Analyst, Inc., 239 F.3d 206, 209 (2d Cir. 2001) (“[I]t is unquestioned that Rule 41(b) also gives the district court authority to dismiss a plaintiff's case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. ..”). SO ORDERED. 7 OE he Dated: June 3, 2020 New York, New York ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge