Corley v. United States ( 2020 )

1 “7 □□ £ □ IP bak Cavanosa □ HE] HOTRONICAL DY PEED! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT any et as □ RSL Fp? □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK □ □□ rag fee neennnnnenennenneneX DATE Fi Lea: Bl Sla0a0 United States of America, eI EA 13 CR. 48 (AJN) 18 CIVIL 5050 (AJN) 18 CIVIL 9280 (AJN) JUDGMENT -against- Royce Corley, Defendant. een nee eee eee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 11, 2020, Corley's motion for a new trial is DENIED, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED, and his motion for a return of property is DENIED. Since Corley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Court further finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962); accordingly, cases 18cv5050 and 18cv9280 are closed. DATED: New York, New York August 18, 2020 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: AN 0AGO Deputy Cle