Infinity Transportation MSN 6651, LLC v. Synergy Aerospace Corp. ( 2021 )

DOCUMENT □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT seam SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:_ -----------------------------------------------------------------X | DATE FILED: 2/3/2021 INFINITY TRANSPORTATION MSN 6651, LLC, Plaintiff, 19-CV-00209 (RA)(SN) “against FOR DAMAGES INQUEST SYNERGY AEROSPACE CORP, Defendant. nnn nnn nn eK SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On February 1, 2021, the Honorable Ronnie Abrams referred this case to my docket to conduct an inquest and to report and recommend concerning Plaintiff's damages after entering a default judgment as to liability against Defendant. It is now ORDERED that: 1. No later than 30 days after entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall file Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law describing all claimed damages and any other monetary relief. Plaintiff should file this document, along with any accompanying exhibits and affidavits, to ECF under “Civil Events/Other Filings/Trial Documents.” Plaintiff shall serve a complete copy of their filimg and a copy of this Order by mail to Defendant’s last known address. 2. Plaintiff shall support his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with affidavits and other documentary evidence. Each proposed finding of fact shall cite the evidence provided. 3. Defendant shall file a response, if any, no later than 30 days after service. Defendant shall respond to each Finding of Fact and Conclusion of Law asserted by Plaintiff. Defendant may also submit Counter Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Defendant shall support each finding of fact (in both its response to Plaintiff's filing, as well as their own Counter-Statement) with affidavits or other documentary evidence. Each proposed finding of fact shall cite the evidence provided. 4. The Court hereby notifies the parties that 1t may conduct this inquest based solely upon the written submissions of the parties. See Action S.A. v. Mare Rich & Co., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991); Fustok v. ContiCommodity Servs. Inc., 873 F.2d 38, 40 (2d Cir. 1989). Any party seeking an evidentiary hearing on damages must set forth reasons why the inquest should not be based upon the written submissions alone and include a description of what witnesses would be called to testify and the nature of the evidence that would be submitted. 5. Plaintiff is directed to mail this order to Defendant’s last known address and file proof of service. SO ORDERED. | | A —. SARAH NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: February 3, 2021 New York, New York