Rivera v. Gonzalez-Espinoza ( 2020 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TUT TT Ts sme me me ee eee ee ee eX ELIEZER RIVERA, Plaintiff, -against- 20-cv-9131 (LAK) (LAK) YANIER GONZALEZ-ESPONIZA, et ano., Defendant(s) TTS Te mm ee ee ee eee HX ORDER LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint or notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: Ww The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e. g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). Oo The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 US. 195 (1990). of The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before November 10, 2020, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be dismissed (or remanded). SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2020 | Lewis A“Kaplan United States District Judge