Paguada v. Micron Technology, Inc. ( 2021 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC-SDNY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC: DILENIA PAGUADA, on behalf of herself and all other DATE FILED: 3/26/2021 persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 21-CV-559 (RA) v. ORDER MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle this mater. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty- day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2021 jij New York, New York he oy Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge