Crabbe v. 35 Police Precinct ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EMELINDA CRABBE, Plaintiff, 22-CV-7752 (LTS) -against- 35 POLICE PRECINCT; TIME SQUARE ORDER OF DISMISSAL ALLIANCE; GARMENT INDUSTRY; 34 UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 STREET PRECINCT, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On October 18, 2019, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this court without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Crabbe v. Manhattan Mini Storage, ECF 1:19-CV-0013, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2019). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, but she has not sought leave from the court to file this action. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the October 18, 2019, order. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2022 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge