Amelio v. Houri ( 2024 )

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 3/25/2024 CARMINE P. AMELIO, et al, 22-CV-975 (DEH) (RWL) Plaintiffs, : ORDER - against - : GALIA HOURI, EYAL RONEN, et al, Defendants. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Once again, Plaintiffs have filed a motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 95) of a decision denying their motion for reconsideration (Dkts. 93-94). Plaintiffs previously have been informed that they cannot move to reconsider a decision denying reconsideration (Dkt. 79). Plaintiffs are warned not to continue to file frivolous and vexatious motions as they have previously done in this case and in other cases. See, e.g., Amelio v. Piazza, No. 19-CV-5944, 2020 WL 5535241, at *2, 4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2020) (stating Bankruptcy Court’s finding that Carmine Amelio “is a vexatious litigant” who has “purposely filed frivolous and vexatious motions and pleadings,” and independently concluding that Carmine Amelio “has demonstrated a history of vexatious, harassing, and duplicative lawsuits”). Failure to do so may result in sanctions, including a filing injunction. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. 95. SO ORDERED. ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: March 25, 2024 New York, New York Copies transmitted this date to all counsel of record. The Court respectfully requests the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiffs: Carmine P. Amelio 32 Main Street New Milford, CT 06776 Alfonso Amelio 32 Main Street New Milford, CT 06776 Paul Amelio 32 Main Street New Milford, CT 06776