Morales v. Local 32BJ ( 2024 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [UCIAA MORALES. SSS™S™~S~S~S~S Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 8700 (OTW) -against- JUDGMENT LOCAL 32BJ, et al. Defendants. eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated March 25, 2024, Defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 31 and 34) are GRANTED. Although pro se complaints should generally be given leave to amend when there is “any indication that a valid claim might be stated," Thompson v. Carter, 284 F.3d 411, 416 (2d Cir. 2002), amendment may be denied upon a finding of futility. See Chill v. Gen. Elec. Co., 101 F.3d 263, 27172 (2d Cir. 1996). Here, Plaintiff has not pleaded either element of her hybrid claim and has pleaded facts that would make it impossible for her to do so. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 25, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: ER Deputy Clerk