Rose v. Stowell ( 1753 )


Menu:
  • Roger Rose plaint. conta Samuel Stowell Defendt According to Attachmt upon bond datd 6th Febr 1671. And the Defendt produceing his Summons by which hee was warned to Answer for hot paying according to bond datd 6° Febr 1678. The plaint. was nonsutd in failure of Summons.

    [ See case of same title, above, p. 932.]

Document Info

Filed Date: 1/1/1753

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024