Whelan Drug Co. v. Doz, Inc. , 183 N.Y.S.2d 257 ( 1958 )


Menu:
  • M. Henry Martuscello, J.

    Plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente Ute in this action to restrain defendant from violating the Pair Trade Law (General Business Law, §§ 369-a, 369-b).

    The only objection raised by defendant that has any legal merit is that based on the claim that it had no knowledge of the fair-trade agreements at the time it first purchased the subject items. (Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. J. W. Mays, Inc., 5 A D 2d 140.) Although this claim of lack of knowledge may appear to be tenuous, the veracity thereof cannot be passed upon at this time; and in view of the extraordinary relief sought, the motion for a temporary injunction is denied, but the action will be set down for trial on January 12,1959.

    Settle order on notice.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 16 Misc. 2d 640, 183 N.Y.S.2d 257, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2139

Judges: Martuscello

Filed Date: 12/17/1958

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024