First National Bank v. Eaton , 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 ( 1895 )


Menu:
  • Hardin, P. J.:

    As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. (Code, § 1349; Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v. Lynch, 16 N. Y. 514; Sheffield, v. Robinson, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 163; S. C., sub nom. Sheffield v. Mur*107ray, 80 Hun, 555; Lee v. Timkin, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 764; S. C., 81 Hun, 81; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 id. 506.)

    Tbe appeal should be dismissed.

    Martin and Merwin, JJ., concurred.

    Appeal dismissed, without costs. (See 68 Hun, 506.)

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106

Judges: Hardin, Martin, Merwin

Filed Date: 2/15/1895

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/10/2022