Seely v. Shattuck , 1 Cole. Cas. 126 ( 1800 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The rule is gone , the plaintiff should have applied the term after service of the rule, *128He cannot lie by in this manner, and revive the cause at any distant period he may choose.

    He must now take nothing by his motion.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. Cas. 126

Filed Date: 10/15/1800

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024