Ex parte Eastabrooks ( 1825 )


Menu:
  • The Court said they were very clearly of opinion, that the penalty being more than double the amount of the judgment was no objection ; though its being less, Was so, because it might abridge the rights of the appellee. It may be for his benefit, but cannot possibly injure him, that the bond is for more. And they awarded an alternative mandamus.

    Rule accordingly.

Document Info

Filed Date: 10/15/1825

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024