M'Cafferty v. M'Cabe , 13 How. Pr. 275 ( 1856 )


Menu:
  • Davies, Justice.

    I am unable to perceive upon what principle this court can be called on to interfere in this case by injunction. The proper public body has made a contract, which 'is not alleged is improper, in any respect, to perform for" the corporation certain work. It is not denied that this is all lawful, or that the work ought not to be done. But the plaintiff says, the defendant is not doing the work in accordance with his contract, and asks this court to say that he shall only do it in conformity with its stipulations. An injunction has been issued, in conformity with this prayer, and the defendant ihsists he has done, and always has been doing the work in conformity with- the contract. If this injunction stands, it must be followed by a motion on the part of the plaintiff, to punish the defendant for a contempt in violating it, by not doing the work in conformity with the contract, while he alleges that he has not violated it, because the work has been done in accordance with the contract.

    Such issues cannot be conveniently disposed of in this court, and would lead, in my judgment, to withdrawing from the appropriate public officers the inspection and supervision of the great amount of work done for the corporation. The plaintiff is not without adequate and full remedy» As a tax-payer, he can obtain an injunction, if his premises are correct, against the corporation, from paying the defendant anything on account of his contract, until he shall have fully complied with all its terms and provisions; or he may, -as an owner of property benefited by the improvement, and to be assessed by the corporation to reimburse the city treasury for its expense, obtain *277an injunction, restraining them from making such an assessment, until the defendant shall have fully complied with his contract. Either of these remedies are open to the plaintiff, and, in my opinion, far more effective and proper than the one now sought.

    I am satisfied the present injunction cannot be sustained, either on principle or authority, and must, therefore, be dissolved.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 13 How. Pr. 275

Judges: Davies

Filed Date: 12/15/1856

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024