Chestney v. Coon , 8 Johns. 150 ( 1811 )

Per Curiam.

The evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. The plaintiff below went, as it appears, to Watson’s grist mill to get his grain ground, and for no other purpose, and he generally went there when he could not have it ground in his own town. The j udgKtent must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed,