Fitzhuch v. Runyon , 8 Johns. 375 ( 1811 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The parol proof to show that there was a mistake in the written contract, was inadmissible. It *376js a well settled rule, that, such proof is never admissible, ’ , r . . in a court of law, to contradict a writing. The judgment below, must be reversed.

    Judgment reversed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 8 Johns. 375

Filed Date: 10/15/1811

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024