Wilbur v. How , 8 Johns. 444 ( 1811 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    This case comes within the principle laid down in Doolin v. Ward. (6 Johns. Rep. 194.) The contract was a nudum pactum, and a fraud on the vendor. The judgment below must be reversed.

    Judgment reversed.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 8 Johns. 444

Filed Date: 10/15/1811

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/9/2024