Juhel v. Rhinelander , 2 Johns. Cas. 120 ( 1800 )

The Court (Benson, J

dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r

Judgment for the plaintiff.(^b)

b (b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.