Shackleton v. Wainwright Manufacturing Co. , 7 N.Y. St. Rep. 872 ( 1887 )

Per Curiam.

The affidavits taken together did establish the fact_ that the corporation was engaged in business in this state and that its business was managed by and under the supervision of Aspinwall, which made him a managing agent within the third subdivision of section 432 of the Code, as that has. been construed and applied in Palmer v. Pennsylvania Company, 35 Hun, 369.

The order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.