-
Dykman, J. There has been no misapprehension of this case, and the litigation has been full and prolonged.
The question involved is insufficient to justify the allowance of an appeal to the court of appeals, and the motion for a re-argument should, therefore, be denied, but without costs.
Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J., concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 901
Judges: Dykman
Filed Date: 5/9/1887
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024