Cross v. Hobson , 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367 ( 1804 )

*Per Curiam.

The defendant can take nothing by his motion. In the cause of Caldwell v. Graham, decided in January term, 1803, we determined we would not help an insolvent who omitted to plead his discharge as he might have done.^[1]

Motion denied.

[1] See case of Shaw v. Wilmerden, 2 Cai. R. 38; Van Valkenbergh v. Dederick, 1 J. C 133; see Billings v. Skutt, 1 J. C. 105.