Cornuel v. Heinze , 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 461 ( 1893 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    We are of the opinion that the court had power to allow the plaintiff to file security for costs after the expiration of the time limited in the order, as extended by the stipulation, upon such *118terms as were just and equitable; and that it had the right to refuse to dismiss the complaint upon the plaintiffs’ complying with such terms, and filing such security. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 22 N.Y.S. 117, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 461

Filed Date: 2/17/1893

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024