-
PRATT, J. The proof shows that Solly bought the land with the understanding that it could be used for business purposes. We think the court below correctly held that under that description a liquor business should be permitted. It follows that Solly could not be required to accept a deed restricting him from selling liquors. His failure to object at once was sufficiently explained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 26 N.Y.S. 150, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 272
Judges: Pratt
Filed Date: 12/1/1893
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024