Winchester v. Browne , 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 154 ( 1889 )


Menu:
  • Van Brunt, P. J.

    We see no error in allowing the substitution of the undertaking in question, but as, in our judgment, the substituted surety has failed to justify, the order should be affirmed, without costs.

    Brady, J., concurs.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 6 N.Y.S. 913, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 154, 53 Hun 635, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 836

Judges: Brunt, Daniels

Filed Date: 7/9/1889

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024