Peters v. Chamberlain ( 1891 )


Menu:
  • Van Brunt, P. J.

    The facts in this case are similar to those in the case of Freeman v. Electric Lighting Co., ante, 93, (decided herewith,) except that the motion was denied, instead of being granted; and for the reasons stated in that opinion the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, as against the respondent Botsford, and the motion granted. All concur.

Document Info

Judges: Brunt

Filed Date: 1/16/1891

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024