Emerson v. Emerson ( 1895 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Even if the court could entertain this motion, our examination of the record leads to the conclusion that the discretion of the special term was not improperly exercised in refusing to allow a counsel fee to the plaintiff, to be employed in securing counsel to oppose defendant’s motion. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/15/1895

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024