Mead v. New York Elevated Railroad , 12 Misc. 646 ( 1895 )

Per Cu/riam.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and Gildersleeve, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.