Clark v. Adams , 18 N.Y. St. Rep. 470 ( 1888 )

Per Curiam.

The reason assigned' by the trial judge for refusing to dismiss the complaint was erroneous, but the ruling was correct. The action was for an accounting and the record shows that the counterclaim to which the plaintiff made no reply, was allowed to the defendants in the computation of the amount for which the plaintiff had judgment. As to the merits, the opinion delivered by the learned judge at special term is correct. The record discloses no error, and, upon the whole case, it appears that, substantial justice has been done."

Judgment affirmed with costs.