Smith v. Fremont , 115 Ohio St. 729 ( 1926 )

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause, on the authority of Shryock, a Taxpayer, v. City of Zanesville,92 Ohio St. 375, 110 N.E. 937, and Vansuch, Dir. of PublicSafety Service, v. State, ex rel. Fetch, 112 Ohio St. 688,148 N.E. 232.

Petition in error dismissed.

JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, KINKADE and ROBINSON, JJ., concur.