Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion) , 2018 Ohio 4305 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as
    Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No.
    
    2018-Ohio-4305
    .]
    NOTICE
    This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
    advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to
    promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65
    South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other
    formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before
    the opinion is published.
    SLIP OPINION NO. 
    2018-OHIO-4305
    MENLO REALTY INCOME PROPERTIES 28, L.L.C., APPELLANT, v. FRANKLIN
    COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.
    [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it
    may be cited as Menlo Realty Income Properties 28, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd.
    of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 
    2018-Ohio-4305
    .]
    Taxation—Real-property valuation—Board of Tax Appeals failed to consider
    property owner’s appraisal evidence—Decision of Board of Tax Appeals
    vacated and cause remanded.
    (No. 2017-0072—Submitted July 17, 2018—Decided October 25, 2018.)
    APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-445.
    __________________
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} Because the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) did not fully consider the
    appraisal evidence presented by appellant, Menlo Realty Income Properties 28,
    L.L.C., we vacate the decision of the BTA and remand the case for further
    proceedings on the authority of Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision,
    SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
    
    150 Ohio St.3d 527
    , 
    2017-Ohio-4415
    , 
    83 N.E.3d 916
    , and Spirit Master Funding IX,
    L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 
    2018-Ohio-4302
    , ___
    N.E.3d ___. On remand, the parties shall not be permitted to present new evidence.
    See Bronx Park S. III Lancaster, L.L.C. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision, ___ Ohio
    St.3d ___, 
    2018-Ohio-1589
    , ___ N.E.3d ___, ¶ 13.
    Decision vacated
    and cause remanded.
    O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, DEWINE,
    and DEGENARO, JJ., concur.
    _________________
    Sleggs, Danzinger & Gill Co., L.P.A., and Todd W. Sleggs, for appellant.
    Rich & Gillis Law Group, L.L.C., Mark H. Gillis, Karol C. Fox, Kelly A.
    Gorry, Kimberly G. Allison, and Richelle L. Thoburn, for appellee Columbus City
    School District Board of Education.
    _________________
    2