State Ex Rel. Bell v. Madison County Board of Commissioners , 128 Ohio St. 3d 357 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Bell v. Madison Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 
    128 Ohio St. 3d 357
    , 2011-Ohio-
    527.]
    THE STATE EX REL. BELL, APPELLANT, v. MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF
    COMMISSIONERS ET AL., APPELLEES.
    [Cite as State ex rel. Bell v. Madison Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,
    
    128 Ohio St. 3d 357
    , 2011-Ohio-527.]
    Mandamus — Petition seeking order compelling county board of commissioners
    to comply with R.C. 163.01 to 163.02 in taking of real property rights and
    to comply with consent agreement — Adequate remedies at law exist in
    civil actions — Writ denied.
    (No. 2010-1525 — Submitted February 2, 2011 — Decided February 9, 2011.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA2010-04-010.
    __________________
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the
    petition of appellant, Greg A. Bell, for a writ of mandamus ordering appellee
    Madison County Board of Commissioners to comply with R.C. 163.01 and
    163.02 to provide him with due process in the taking of his real property rights
    and to comply with a consent agreement.
    {¶ 2} “Mandamus will not issue if there is a plain and adequate remedy
    in the ordinary course of law.” State ex rel. McClaran v. Ontario, 
    119 Ohio St. 3d 105
    , 2008-Ohio-3867, 
    892 N.E.2d 440
    , ¶ 15; R.C. 2731.05. Bell had adequate
    remedies at law by way of the civil actions and appeals he has already pursued.
    See, e.g., Madison Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Bell, Madison C.P. No. 2003CV-02-
    071, affirmed in Madison Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Bell, Madison App. No.
    CA2005-09-036, 2007-Ohio-1373, appeal not accepted, Madison Cty. Bd. of
    Commrs. v. Bell, 
    114 Ohio St. 3d 1512
    , 2007-Ohio-4285, 
    872 N.E.2d 953
    ; Bell v.
    Nichols, Franklin C.P. No. 2008-CVH04-6427, affirmed in Bell v. Nichols,
    Franklin App. No. 09AP-438, 2009-Ohio-4851.
    {¶ 3} Moreover, the mere fact that Bell has already unsuccessfully
    invoked some of these alternate remedies does not thereby entitle him to the
    requested extraordinary relief in mandamus. See State ex rel. Agosto v. Cuyahoga
    Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    119 Ohio St. 3d 366
    , 2008-Ohio-4607, 
    894 N.E.2d 314
    , ¶ 12; State ex rel. Dreamer v. Mason, 
    115 Ohio St. 3d 190
    , 2007-Ohio-4789,
    
    874 N.E.2d 510
    , ¶ 13.
    Judgment affirmed.
    O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,
    LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
    __________________
    Phillip Wayne Cramer, for appellant.
    Onda, LaBuhn, Rankin & Boggs Co., L.P.A., and Timothy S. Rankin, for
    appellee Madison County Board of Commissioners.
    ______________________
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-1525

Citation Numbers: 2011 Ohio 527, 128 Ohio St. 3d 357

Judges: O'Connor, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, Brown

Filed Date: 2/9/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024