Gustin v. Chaney ( 2006 )

[Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.]
GUSTIN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. CHANEY ET AL, APPELLANTS.
[Cite as Gustin v. Chaney, 112 Ohio St.3d 102, 2006-Ohio-6509.]
Evidence — Damages — Collateral-source rule — Court of appeals’ judgment
affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates.
(No. 2006-0655 — Submitted November 15, 2006 — Decided
December 27, 2006.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Highland County,
No. 05CA7, 2006-Ohio-1049.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority
of Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
__________________
Gary D. Ostendarp and Paul N. Herdman, for appellees.
Droder & Miller Co., L.P.A., Bradley A. Powell, and Jeffrey T. Kenney,
for appellants.
______________________
1