In re Application of Reynolds , 127 Ohio St. 3d 331 ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as In re Application of Reynolds, 
    127 Ohio St.3d 331
    , 
    2010-Ohio-5947
    .]
    IN RE APPLICATION OF REYNOLDS.
    [Cite as In re Application of Reynolds, 
    127 Ohio St.3d 331
    , 
    2010-Ohio-5947
    .]
    Attorneys — Character and fitness — Application to register as a candidate for
    admission to the bar — Application disapproved, with permission to
    reapply.
    (No. 2010-1358 — Submitted September 28, 2010 — Decided
    December 9, 2010.)
    ON REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Character and
    Fitness of the Supreme Court, No. 431.
    __________________
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} In 2008, Steven Todd Reynolds of Lebanon, Ohio, applied for
    permission to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law in Ohio
    and to take the bar examination. The Admissions Committee of the Warren
    County Bar Association conducted an investigation of his character and fitness.
    The committee made an unfavorable recommendation, and Reynolds appealed.
    See Gov.Bar R. I(12).
    {¶ 2} A formal hearing on the matter was scheduled for February 12,
    2010, before a three-member panel of the Board of Commissioners on Character
    and Fitness, but it was canceled at the request of the applicant. The matter was
    later rescheduled for June 11, 2010, but the applicant failed to appear at the
    hearing.
    {¶ 3} Based upon the applicant’s failure to attend the hearing, the panel
    unanimously found that the applicant had failed to cooperate in the character and
    fitness process and had failed to meet his burden of proving that he has the
    requisite character and fitness to be permitted to sit for the Ohio bar exam. The
    SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
    panel, therefore, recommended that his application be denied until he has
    cooperated with the board and a full hearing regarding his character and fitness
    has been conducted.
    {¶ 4} The board concurred in the panel’s recommendation that the
    applicant be disapproved. The board also recommended that the applicant be
    permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by filing a new
    application to register as a candidate for admission to the practice of law and an
    application to take the bar examination.
    {¶ 5} Based upon the foregoing, we accept the board’s recommendation
    to disapprove the applicant’s pending application. The applicant may apply to
    take a future bar exam, provided that he submits a new application to register as a
    candidate for admission to the practice of law and an application to take the bar
    examination and cooperates with a complete character and fitness investigation,
    including an investigation and report by the National Conference of Bar
    Examiners, so that we may determine whether he possesses the requisite
    character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law in
    Ohio.
    Judgment accordingly.
    BROWN,    C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,       LUNDBERG   STRATTON,   O’CONNOR,
    O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
    __________________
    David E. Ernst, for the Warren County Bar Association.
    ______________________
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-1358

Citation Numbers: 2010 Ohio 5947, 127 Ohio St. 3d 331

Judges: Brown, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp

Filed Date: 12/9/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024