Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 
    122 Ohio St.3d 1227
    , 
    2009-Ohio-3451
    .]
    NAGEL, APPELLEE, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT.
    [Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank,
    
    122 Ohio St.3d 1227
    , 
    2009-Ohio-3451
    .]
    Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted.
    (No. 2008-2501 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided July 21, 2009.)
    APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 90662,
    
    179 Ohio App.3d 126
    , 
    2008-Ohio-5741
    .
    __________________
    {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently
    accepted.
    MOYER,      C.J.,   and    PFEIFER,    LUNDBERG        STRATTON,         O’CONNOR,
    O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
    __________________
    Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Patrick J. Perotti; and Brian G.
    Ruschel, for appellee.
    Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Jennifer T. Mills, and L.
    Bradfield Hughes, for appellant.
    ______________________
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2008-2501

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 7/21/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2016