State ex Stivers v. Dawley ( 1926 )

Stivers contends in- the Supreme Court that where a contract for highway improvement provides for alterations during the progress of the work, where the nature of the work required cannot be previously determined, and such alterations or additional work is to be done by directions of county commissioners, and they make a private contract with contractor for such additional work, they cannot do so without publication or certification of funds available.