Bowling Green State University v. Public Utilities Commission ( 1974 )

Per Curiam.

The essence of Bowling Green’s argument is that the rate increase allowed Northern is ■unreasonable as applied to Bowling Green.

This court does not find that the order of the Public Utilities Commission is unreasonable or unlawful. It is, therefore, affirmed.

Order affirmed,

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, SterN, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.